OECD mineral guidance gives lithium teams a recognized structure for evidence categories. Lithium Record can organize documents against that structure without performing the due-diligence review itself. 1
This spoke belongs to the Lithium Provenance Due Diligence pillar at /lithium-provenance-due-diligence/.
Five-step evidence framing
The OECD guidance is commonly summarized through management systems, risk identification and assessment, risk-response strategy, independent third-party audit where applicable, and public reporting. A lithium evidence page can use those categories to label uploaded files. That label helps a reviewer understand the file purpose, but it must not imply that the platform completed an OECD assessment.
Document examples
Management-system records may include supplier policies and responsibility matrices. Risk-identification files may include supplier questionnaires and origin statements. Risk-response records may include mitigation plans or escalation notes. Reporting evidence may include customer-facing summaries. Each document should receive a separate hash and issuer field.
Avoiding overclaim
The page should say the customer mapped the file to an OECD due-diligence category or uploaded evidence related to that category. It should not say Lithium Record determined conformance with OECD guidance, certified responsible sourcing, or conducted an independent audit.